Screenwriter Allison Schroeder on Hidden Figures, #OscarsSoWhite, and more

Allison Schroeder Hidden Figures interview theo melfi taraji p henson janelle monae octavia spencer nasa jim parsons

I felt this huge responsibility to these women, to get it right and to make something that they would be proud of. Katherine Johnson, who’s the only one still with us, her request was that it not be just about her – that we had some of these other women as well, because it was a team effort. That was something I took to heart, and it’s why you’ve got Mary Jackson  and Dorothy Vaughn as well, and we get to see all the other women they worked with in the computing pool. 

Did a great interview with Allison Schroeder around the time of Oscar season; this was a real blast, Allison was great to talk to. We spoke a lot about representation, and the sort of films that Allison wanted her daughter to be able to see while growing up.

Which, in hindsight, I did wonder about. Allison was the first woman I interviewed individually; since then I’ve tried, albeit not necessarily succeeded, to maintain a rough sort of parity between male and female interviewees – as well as interviewing people of colour, though that’s been less successful. Was asking about the sort of films her daughter would watch something I’d ask a male director or screenwriter? I think yes, and it made sense in context – Hidden Figures had been especially impactful with young girls, and Allison had only recently-ish given birth. But it’s something I try to bear in mind, anyway.

That said, the other thought I have after this interview is that I probably should have pushed a little more on the matter of historical accuracy and such; this was the fourth interview I did, and I was a little less confident about things like that, but I definitely think that nowadays I’d be more direct rather than talking around the issue as above.

Facebook | Twitter | Blog Index | Interviews Index

TV Review: Primeval (1×02)

primeval logo hd itv science fiction dinosaurs nick cutter douglas henshall tim haines adrian hodges impossible pictures

You know what? All my life I’ve wanted to be in a crime-busting gang. And now I am. Sort of.

What interested me about this episode was how heavily it focused on character development. It was a very talk-y episode, in fact; long swathes of the runtime dedicated solely to the characters talking and discussing things, with comparatively little action going on. It was an interesting choice for a show like Primeval – you’d expect, simply by virtue of the programme’s nature as a ‘genre show’, as it were, that it’d be packed full of cheap thrills and jump scares, following a fairly generic and formulaic structure.

And yet Primeval, in this case, largely eschewed that – and I’d argue that was to the episode’s credit. In spending so much time focused on our human characters, rather than a runaround with the monsters (which, make no mistake, did feature; just not to the extent one might expect) the show positions itself as a slightly different beast from anything comparable. In many ways it feels like it’s settled a lot since last week; most of the tonal variances have balanced out, giving us an episode that feels a lot more coherent than last week’s. There’s a clear improvement here, and a sense that Primeval has found its footing somewhat – there’s a greater understanding of what it wants to be as a drama.

All this means, then, that after a fairly short space of time we’re beginning to get to grips with our characters to a far better extent. Certainly, there are limits; Stephen remains something of a blank slate, for example, and the same is true of Tom Ryan. But in other places, it really does work; Nick Cutter and Claudia Brown are beginning to develop nicely, in no small part because of the chemistry of Douglas Henshall and Lucy Brown. Their early interactions in Cutter’s office really anchor the first half of the episode – it’s part of why the story works so well, despite (or because of) its nature as a talk-y episode. The real star, though, is Andrew Lee Potts as Connor; while a lot of his dialogue could leave Connor as little more than a simple stock character, Potts plays the role with a degree of self-awareness (particularly the Buffy speech at the end) that makes the character come across as far more endearing, and far more real, than he would have in the hands of a lesser actor.

primeval spiders cilla ware tom ryan adrian hodges science fiction itv hd review

The monster aspect of the story is, if nothing else, functional; there’s a wise choice here to conserve the budget by largely keeping the creatures in the shadows, and limiting their appearances where possible. It’s a sensible economic choice, though I suspect that from a storytelling angle they could have pushed this a little harder – certainly, the direction of the episode is a little perfunctory, and I can’t help but feel that a lot more could have been done with the creatures to make them a little more frightening. A lot of it comes down to mood and the creation of atmosphere; while there were plenty of entirely serviceable sections, there are others where it’s all just a little bit flat.

On the other hand, though, this was a good choice of ‘monster’ – stretching the premise somewhat, and demonstrating that Primeval is about more than just dinosaurs. (Even if it will, admittedly, forever be known as “that one with the dinosaurs”.) I’d have liked to see more done with the comment regarding the oxygen moving back and forth, though; the idea that there’s more than just creatures that could come through and pose a concern is one of the more interesting extensions of the premise that’s been put forward so far. It’s about exploring it as fully as possible, really, and that’s a pretty good way to go about that – hopefully it’ll be returned to in future.

I also appreciated how, broadly speaking, they tied the creature-plot back into the storyline featuring our main characters, demonstrating how Connor is actually useful to the team; it’s a smart way of building the episode, and ensuring that the two threads mesh together, rather than simply running parallel to one another.

nick cutter anomaly underground douglas henshall juliet aubrey james murray cilla ware spiders adrian hodges review

The further development of Nick and Helen’s story is also quite engaging. A huge part of that, obviously, is Douglas Henshall’s performance; he carries the material extremely well, particularly considering we haven’t even been introduced to Juliet Aubrey as Helen yet. More than that, though, he’s able to make the limits to the material actually work. Consider the end, when Nick doesn’t go through the anomaly; really, the only reason why he doesn’t is because we’ve got four more episodes to fill. Here, though, Henshall is able to take that and show us the normally headstrong character in a place of almost trepidant awe – it attaches a far greater level of significance to the moment, and again gives the character a certain interiority beyond what’s in the script.

To be honest, though, that’s pretty much it. I’m starting to run out of things to say, and I suspect in future I’m not going to be able to sustain the same wordcount for these reviews as I typically try to do. It’s not a slight against Primeval as such, but it’s just that as a programme, it’s difficult to write about it; it’s usually just about decent, rarely stellar or abysmal. With no particular praises to sing or flaws to condemn, I’m going to end up running out of steam.

Hopefully, I suppose, that’ll prompt me to start tackling these reviews in a different way, and write them in a different style; I’ve become slightly frustrated with the fact that I’ve settled into a formula, because – if nothing else – it means I’m not really pushing myself as a writer anymore. So, next week, we might see something different. Or perhaps we might not.

Still. This episode was still an improvement on the last, which was good.

7/10

Related:

Primeval reviews

Facebook | Twitter | Blog Index | General TV Index