Some More Thoughts on a Female Doctor

doctor who female doctor who silhouette thirteenth doctor jodie whittaker argument for against chibnall moffat

Introducing a female Doctor isn’t really a new idea – I want to say that the earliest time it was brought up was at the end of Tom Baker’s tenure, but it’s entirely possible that it happened before then too. At one point in the 1980s, Sydney Newman (one of the creators of Doctor Who) made a serious pitch to the BBC, in which he advocated for a female Doctor: he wanted to move on from the “presently largely socially valueless, escapist schlock”, and create something that would “engage the concerns, fears and curiosity” of the audience, by having the Doctor “metamorphosed into a woman.” (He also said Patrick Troughton should come back for a couple of years first, but that’s beside the point.)

So, it’s been something that has been given serious thought at some stage. Moffat has, in the past year, said that eventually someone will cast a female Doctor, because the time will be right, and they’ll think of an actress who is worth pursuing in particular – but that it’d very much be a case of casting a person, rather than a gender.

What I’m saying is essentially what Sydney Newman said – the BBC should specifically look for a female Doctor. From conception to casting, the thirteenth Doctor should always and completely be explicitly female.

Doctor Who is always at its best when it’s doing something new. The key appeal of the program is the breadth of the narrative; when Doctor Who fully realises the concept of “anywhere in time and space, anything that ever happened or ever will”, that is when it really sings. Innovation has always been the biggest achievement of the show.

And a female Doctor is the next logical step. It’s the next thing that the BBC can do to open up new possibilities, bring new potential and create new stories.

It comes back to a Steven Moffat quote, actually – “when your new idea has become your old idea, it’s time to get a new idea.” The male Doctor has become an old idea. At this stage, it’s time for there to be a new idea – a female Doctor. (Or, at least, it’s an old idea, but it’s one that’s never been realised, so…)

Think, for a moment, about all the different actresses who could play the Doctor. Olivia Coleman. Lara Pulver. Tilda Swinton. Angel Coulby. Katie McGrath. Sophie Okonedo. Natalie Dormer – my own personal choice.

I would say there are very few fans who, if you asked them, couldn’t think of an actress who’d do an amazing job as the Doctor. One who’d be just as good as Matt Smith, David Tennant, or Peter Capaldi. One who’d be just as good as Benedict Cumberbatch, Hugh Laurie, or Alexander Siddig.


Surely the fact that so many of these fantastic actresses could play the part, and that plenty are willing to do so, is a compelling reason to actually cast one of them? The idea of casting a person rather than a gender is a perfectly fine one – but the fact is that, at the minute, the thinking process is inevitably skewed male. They are, if you like, thinking inside the box. Peter Capaldi was the only person who was auditioned for the role, because they thought he was perfect for it; the thinking leans towards a man. (Not a slight towards Peter Capaldi, of course, he’s excellent.)

Now, okay, I say it’d be new, and at this point, you’re perhaps asking why, or it what way. (Apart from the obvious, that is)

The female Doctor presents a variety of different stories and approaches that you wouldn’t have got with a male Doctor, because it changes the dynamic, and it changes the way in which other characters are going to relate to the Doctor. It’s a new place to take the character – after 50 years now, with a fairly broad character arc, this change offers new choices about where to take the character next.

And that’s key – it is a set of choices. There is no one specific way to do this. Maybe you’d want to tell a story about how someone feels when adjusting to a new gender – the transition between regenerations, and the impact of it, isn’t always focused on for very long, and perhaps this is an opportunity to do so. Or maybe you’d not make such a big deal out of it; concepts of gender could be very different for the Doctor, and it could be as simple as dialogue “This isn’t that different. After all, I’m not sure I ever was a man, exactly.” (I adapted that from an EDA, so there’s a precedent, at least)

I was reading a Doctor Who book once – I forget what it was, probably a guidebook of some sort – and it was talking about the younger Doctors, Davison and Smith, and how they experienced something of a culture shock after their regeneration; because they appeared much younger outwardly, people wouldn’t initially give them much respect, and it’d be harder for them to command authority initially. Obviously by the end of the episode, when they’ve saved everyone’s lives, it’s a little different, but I liked the idea that the Doctor has to adjust to the fact that people’s perceptions of them are different, so they perhaps can’t get they want quite as easily anymore.

Personally, I think that could potentially be an interesting idea to explore with a female Doctor. It could be hard to get right, I suppose, but I think it’s necessary to explore the fact that she would, at some stage, be on the receiving end of sexism. It fits quite well with Doctor Who though – if one of the big themes of the show has always been standing up to oppressors and to bullies and to people who are in the wrong, then misogyny and the patriarchy are logical things to address.

doctor who female doctor romana 2 lalla ward scarf hat tom baker fourth doctor douglas adams shada jodie whittaker thirteenth doctor chris chibnall

But, you know, that’s just something I’d find interesting. There’s any number of interesting approaches you could make, and I think it’s something that would really improve and revitalise the show. In fact, I’d go as far as to say that you’d actually increase viewing things by a fair amount, if done right.

The first episode of any new Doctor always attracts a larger audience, because you get more of the casual viewers and general public who are curious to see how it goes. This would apply even more so with a female Doctor, I imagine, because the curiosity would be even greater. I don’t even think you’d alienate that many people, to be honest – everyone is going to be curious enough to watch at least the first episode. Even the massive nerds who threaten to quit the show won’t, because they want the chance to bitch about it online.

If that first episode was successful enough, I think there’s a chance to capture the attention of a lot of people who are more casual viewers, and get them to watch the show again each week. It’d require careful thought – you’d want something more in the vein of The Eleventh Hour rather than The Christmas Invasion. Perhaps it’d be worth showing the first two episodes as a double bill? Debateable really.

In any case, I think we can all say with complete certainty that there will be a female Doctor one day soon. Personally, my hope is that when Peter Capaldi eventually hands over the keys to the TARDIS, the incumbent Time Lord will be played by Natalie Dormer.


On the subject of a female Doctor Who

Facebook | Twitter | Blog Index | Doctor Who Index

Some Thoughts on a Female Doctor

doctor who female doctor who silhouette thirteenth doctor jodie whittaker argument for against chibnall moffat

So, what with Michelle Gomez being cast as the first female Master (and doing pretty amazingly) it got me thinking about a female Doctor.

Now, in the past, I was pretty set against it. The reasons varied with time (as a stupid 8-year-old, I was making comments about “Nurse Who”, and as a stupid 14-year-old it was “weird fanfiction”) but essentially, I didn’t really like the idea of a change. I became a lot more receptive to the idea over time, and up until recently basically thought, “the audition pool should encompass men and women, and then whoever is the best can get the job”.

But over the past few days, I’ve changed my mind. It shouldn’t be a case of opening the auditions to men and women, and then casting the best of them. The BBC production office should actively look for and cast a female Doctor. The Thirteenth Doctor should be explicitly female from the genesis of her character, right the way to the casting, the announcement, the writing, and the broadcast. She should be created with a specific gender in mind.

Now, I assume a fair few people have just pulled disgusted faces, and are ready to blacklist me from the internet, destroy their computers, and possibly become a reclusive hermit. (Though I imagine most of my fans are already reclusive hermits.)

Hear me out though, because I reckon this is a really good idea.

I mean first, we should sort of dispense with the main arguments against having a female Doctor, rebutting them and just generally getting them out of the way, before I explain why this is THE BEST IDEA EVER. (If you can’t tell, I’m actually quite excited by this.)

Obviously, there’s a lot of nonsense out there. A surprising number of Doctor Who fans are actually sadly quite petty and misogynistic – they’re also amongst the most vocal, naturally. You end up hearing all sorts of nonsense about how this would ruin the show, it’s an unnecessary change, blah blah blah. This article does a far better, and far funnier, job of dealing with those people than I ever could, so here’s a link to it. Some things, though, are repeated quite often, which seems to give them a degree of legitimacy, as if they’re actually genuine solutions.


Often, you get things like “Oh, there should be a spin-off with Romana/River Song/A new Time Lady instead”, because people tend to think that meets the same requirements that a female Doctor would. And whilst it does solve some of the issues – it’d be a program with a female lead, which is good in terms of diversity – it doesn’t actually solve all of them. It’s something I spoke about a bit last year, with regards to Idris Elba playing James Bond, rather than 009:

James Bond as a character – as an idea – means more than a brand new double-oh-nine character. 009, as played by Idris Elba, could be really cool, but he could never be Bond. And Bond will always take priority. Because Bond means more – because Bond has the history, and the cultural weight – James Bond will have a greater impact. Whereas 009 would be forgotten, Bond would not.

The same is true of the Doctor. If you cast a female Doctor, that is a far greater positive step for representation and diversity than something which would essentially be – not quite dismissed as, but limited to – “just another Doctor Who spin-off”. A female Doctor is a headline. A spin-off is a footnote. Whether that is ‘right’ or not is certainly debatable, but that’s how it would be. The ramifications and impact of a female Doctor would be far greater than that of another spin-off.

The idea of the impact, then, leads relatively neatly onto the next point, which is one of role models. It’s the idea that, essentially, by having a female Doctor, you lose a positive male role model – someone who doesn’t represent stereotypical masculinity, someone solves problems through wit and intellect rather than fighting and violence, and so on and so forth.

That particular argument is a bit of a tricky one, because it does approach a sensible point. It doesn’t, of course, address the question of why boys can’t still look up to a female role model, or suggest the place of a male companion – someone who can just as easily fulfil the role of someone who isn’t typically masculine – or even talk about other positive male role models. Real world examples, like father, uncles, brothers, cousins, friends, teachers, or fictional ones, like Harry Potter, Sherlock Holmes, Dr. Spock, and so on and so forth.

So, actually, I don’t think this one is that important. It just seems to approach a sensible point, but by not taking into account quite a few other, very important, factors, it doesn’t quite hold much sway.

doctor who russell t davies female doctor tardis arguments for against new episodes series 9 two parter steven moffat chris chibnall

Those two arguments are, really, the only main ones that are bandied around with much traction; most other things can be dismissed with relative ease. The only other ones that remain are worth mentioning because of who proposed them – Peter Davison and Russell T Davies, who are notable for being amongst the few people associated with Doctor Who that weren’t immediately positive about the idea.

Peter Davison stated that, essentially, he believed that a female Doctor would change the relationship between Doctor and companion – or at least, the way in which we saw it. Because the companion, nowadays, often acts as a conscience for the Doctor, having a female Doctor take instruction from and defer to a male companion might create stereotypes, and not actually be as progressive as one might want. And whilst it is actually a legitimate concern – because yes, you’d need to be careful about the ways in which you approach writing the new dynamic – it’s actually quite easily fixed, simply with careful and considered writing. (Or, a female companion AND a female Doctor.)

Russell T Davies, on the other hand, said he thought it was unlikely to ever happen, because he thought the BBC wouldn’t be able to deal with the associated outrage, and cited things like fathers not wanting to explain sex changes to their children. That’s probably quite a considered viewpoint, given Davies’ own experience with the “gay agenda” media nonsense, so it’s fair to say he knew what he was talking about. But it’s also important to remember that he said this nearly ten years ago – back in 2008. Nowadays, the approach to such things is a little different. You’ve got Caitlyn Jenner in the news, Michelle Gomez as the Master was quite well received, and Davies himself is going to great lengths to ensure greater representation in his own programs, such as casting a trans actress in a trans role on Banana. (Which was great, by the way, everyone should watch Cucumber and Banana.) I think that, when it comes down to it, this particular problem isn’t so much of an issue anymore.

That, essentially, is it. There are no real good arguments against a female Doctor – or at least, none that I’ve ever come across. In the second part of this post, which I’ll upload tomorrow, I’ll discuss the numerous reasons for a female Doctor, and why it really is such a good idea.


On the subject of a female Doctor Who

Facebook | Twitter | Blog Index | Doctor Who Index